Photo by Michael Caples/MiHockey

Nelson: Sport specialization and how it relates to development in hockey

Photo by Michael Caples/MiHockey

 

Darryl Nelson and Brian Sipotz are regarded as top experts in the field of strength and conditioning for ice hockey performance. Darryl has been the head strength and conditioning coach for USA Hockey’s National Team Development program since 2000 and also serves as the director of performance for Advantage Strength and Conditioning in Ann Arbor. Brian played 7 years of professional ice hockey and is the founder and strength coach of Advantage Strength and Conditioning. Darryl and Brian are also the cofounders of www.hockeystrengthandconditioning.com.

By Darryl Nelson –

Today there is an ongoing debate about sports specialization for kids.  Some people advocate playing one sport starting at a very young age while others advocate playing many sports throughout high school.  One school of thought views early specialization as the best bet for success.  The other views generalization as the optimum route.  My viewpoint, which I have attempted to form based on our models of Long Term Athlete Development falls in between.  I feel that specialization can be good if it’s done correctly.

For young athletes 12 years old and under, it is absolutely essential that a wide array of sports are played.  These sports should be as varied as possible and include vastly different environments.  For example, young kids should be doing activities in the water, on fields and courts, on snow and ice, and even some air-born sports.  Learning in these environments for kids under 6 years old builds a foundation on which they can learn more complex skills later on in their development.  Up to age 10, kids should master gross motor skills and their hockey specific training should be limited to 60 days per year.


Starting at age 10, kids can begin learning fine motor skills or sport specific skills.  This time is critical for developing things like stick handling and shooting and age 10-12 is viewed as a ‘golden’ age for skill development.  At this age hockey-specific training can be increased to a range of 100 to 120 days per year with one hour long sessions.  However, it is also important to note that other sports should still be played.

Over the age of 12 is where kids can begin to specialize in ice hockey a bit.  At 13 to 15 years old I would recommend participation in only two sports.  Hockey specific training can increase from one hour to 1.5 hour long sessions in the range of 120 to 130 days per year.  Also, at this point the number of games can be increased as competition has a more important role to play in development.

Now starting around 15 or 16 years old is when I think kids should specialize in hockey.  By this age foundational movement skill as well as fine motor sport specific skills have been mastered and their window for train-ability is passed.  Now is the optimal age for developing fitness traits and competitiveness.  At this stage players will need around 200 days of on ice hockey specific training and 50 to 60 of those days should be games.

Critics of this model always use the argument that early specialization will be a detriment.  However, what they fail to understand is that this is not early specialization.  It is late specialization.  By age 16 to 18 years old physical growth and maturity is 75 percent complete and the players are nearly a finished product.  At this age it is too late to build movement literacy and greatly increase fine motor skills. At this point the emphasis of training changes to tactics and strategy, position specific requirements, competitiveness, and fitness, strength, and power training.  Therefore, when I advocate specialization I am actually recommending late specialization and not early specialization.